Blog

BCL temporarily amended to facilitate remote corporate governance amid Covid-19

July 22, 2020 | By Patrick T. McCloskey

On June 17, 2020 Governor Cuomo signed into law temporary amendments to the New York Business Corporation Law (BCL) to facilitate corporate governance via remote communication amid Covid-19. While similar BCL modifications were previously implemented by Governor Cuomo on an interim basis through Executive Orders during the earlier stages of the Covid-19 pandemic, the amendments codified in this legislative enactment supersede the earlier changes and will remain effective for the duration of New York’s Covid-19 state of emergency, subject to an outside expiration date of December 31, 2021.

Specifically: (i) Section 602(a) of the BCL was temporarily amended to give a board of directors the discretion to convene a virtual shareholders’ meeting1  and (ii) Section 708(b) of the BCL was temporarily amended to provide that directors may deliver a unanimous written consent by e-mail.

Virtual Shareholders’ Meetings

While Governor Cuomo’s prior Executive Orders implicitly blessed virtual shareholders’ meetings (BCL §§ 602 and 605 were temporarily suspended or modified “to the extent they require[d] meetings of shareholders to be noticed and held at a physical location”), the legislative amendment to BCL § 602(a) expressly permits a board of directors to convene a virtual shareholders’ meeting so long as such board is authorized to determine the place of shareholders’ meetings on behalf of the applicable corporation.

As amended, Section 602(a) of the BCL provides:

Meetings of shareholders may be held at such place, within or without this state, as may be fixed by or under the by-laws, or if not so fixed, [at the office of the corporation in this state]2  as determined by the board of directors. For the duration of the state disaster emergency declared by executive order two hundred two that began on March seventh, two thousand twenty, if, pursuant to this paragraph or the bylaws of the corporation, the board of directors is authorized to determine the place of a meeting of shareholders, the board of directors may, in its sole discretion, determine that the meeting be held solely by means of electronic communication, the platform/service of which shall be the place of the meeting for purpose of this article.3

The BCL was amended in October 2019 to permit hybrid shareholders’ meetings,4  but the concept of a virtual shareholders’ meeting for a New York corporation was not condoned until Governor Cuomo signed Executive Order 202.8 on March 20, 2020.5

In addition to the temporary amendment to BCL § 602(a), analogous temporary amendments permitting virtual meetings were also made to the New York Not-For-Profit Corporation Law and the New York Religious Corporation Law, with the same effective periods.

On top of the health and safety issues associated with an in-person shareholders’ meeting, or even a hybrid meeting where shareholders have the right to physically attend, the restrictions governing such meetings, to the extent held in New York, are complex. Governor Cuomo’s most recent Executive Order limiting non-essential public gatherings (Executive Order 202.45) provides:

The [prior Executive Orders] that limited all non-essential gatherings [are] hereby further modified to allow gatherings of fifty (50) or fewer individuals for any lawful purpose or reason, so long as any such gatherings occurring indoors do not exceed 50% of the maximum occupancy for a particular indoor area, and provided that the location of the gathering is in a region that has reached Phase 4 of the State’s reopening, and provided further that social distancing, face covering, and cleaning and disinfection protocols required by the Department of Health are adhered to.

These restrictions remain in effect until July 26, 2020 and is unclear whether they will be modified or extended. Subject to any such modification or extension, any corporation contemplating an in-person or hybrid shareholders’ meeting in New York would need to consider, in addition to overall Covid-19 health and safety concerns (including the required protocols), the maximum number of attendees, the maximum occupancy of the premises and the attainment of Phase 4 in the applicable region.6

Delivery of Unanimous Written Consent by E-mail

The other temporary amendment to the BCL modifies § 708(b) to provide that when a board acts by unanimous written consent in lieu of a meeting, each director may deliver its written consent by e-mail transmission, so long as it can be reasonably determined that such e-mail was authorized by the applicable director.

As amended, BCL Section 708(b) provides:

Unless otherwise restricted by the certificate of incorporation or the by-laws, any action required or permitted to be taken by the board or any committee thereof may be taken without a meeting if all members of the board or the committee consent in writing to the adoption of a resolution authorizing the action. The resolution and the written consents thereto by the members of the board or the committee shall be filed with the minutes of the proceedings of the board or committee. For the duration of the state disaster emergency declared by executive order two hundred two that began on March seventh, two thousand twenty, notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, the written consent of a member may be made electronically, where such consent is submitted via electronic mail along with information from which it can be reasonably determined that the transmission was authorized by such member.7

For boards of directors that wish to approve matters by unanimous written consent instead of convening a meeting, this additional language clarifies that such written consents may, during the effectiveness of the amendment, be delivered by e-mail transmission. Alternatively, a board of directors could convene a meeting “by means of a conference telephone or similar communications equipment allowing all persons participating in the meeting to hear each other at the same time,8  in which case approval need not be unanimous, but must conform to the quorum and approval provisions contained in the corporation’s bylaws.

The above referenced alternatives to an in-person board meeting are subject to any provisions in the applicable corporation’s certificate of incorporation or bylaws that may limit or prohibit such actions.9

This post is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No one should rely on the information in this blog post without seeking appropriate legal, accounting, tax or other appropriate advice from an attorney, accountant or other professional properly licensed in the applicable jurisdiction(s).

_________

1A virtual shareholders’ meeting has no physical location—all attendees participate via remote communication.

2The text in brackets is removed and inapplicable until December 31, 2021, but is set to be restored on such date.

3The text in italics is set to be removed and repealed on December 31, 2021.

4A hybrid shareholders’ meeting has a physical location, but shareholders who wish to attend can do so by physical attendance or through remote communication.

5Numerous other states, including Delaware, permit virtual stockholders’ meetings and, unlike New York, there is no limitation on the statutory duration tied to the Covid-19 pandemic. See Section 211(a)(1) of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

6It is not clear whether a meeting of shareholders would be deemed to be a “non-essential gathering” for purposes of Governor Cuomo’s Executive Orders. Under the circumstances, the conservative approach would be to assume that a meeting of shareholders would in fact be a “non-essential gathering.”

7The temporary amendment is set in italics. Such language is set to expire and be repealed on December 31, 2021.

8See BCL § 708(c)

9See BCL §§ 708(b) & (c).